5. Testimony of Susan Doherty:
I have attend all the school
district sponsored forums on restructuring,two, and the forum
the PTA put on January 8th. So I was quite taken back when Mr.
Martin stated in his presentation on the 19th that we've been
talking about restructuring for 10 years. I've been told that
Superintendent Martin is a smart man so I assumed he chose his
word talking for a reason. The simplest definition of the word is to
use speech. It's synonym is to speak, to utter words or to articulate
sounds with an ordinary voice. I guess we have been talking.
But we the parents, teachers and residents are asking for and
deserve is to discuss a restructuring plan with the board. To
investigate by reason or argument, to present in detail the plans.
I don't think that's an unreasonable request. Mr. Martin again
said that a lot of people are for restructuring and a lot of
people are against it. So I am assuming that we're not talking
about a lot of land, or a motion picture lot, or my lot as a
fate, so that it must mean in the most obscure use of the word
a considerable quantity. No wonder school teachers and moms go
crazy when kids use these two words to define a number. What
is a considerable quantity? If you're saying, I have six kids,
that's a lot! But if I have six dollars that's not a lot. We've
asked and asked for the school district to survey the entire
district. We as PTAs and schools can not do that. Are you afraid
of what you might find out? If you do send out a survey, please
do us the favor of making it as straight forward and as unbiased
as possible. Who knows, that vocal minority just may end up being
the silent majority. Going back to Superintendent Martin's being
a smart man, not knowing where the Charter School would be housed
when enrollment increases doesn't sound like the actions of a
very smart person whose job it is to run this school district.
So if you really are smart, you know exactly where it would go.
But you also know that that choice would be very unpalatable
to all the parents who have kids in the elementary schools. So
you'll spring that one on us when we're so far down the slippery
slope we can't stop. Building availability has not changed since
the Charter School was put in the high school so it has to go
in one of the other schools. Or maybe if you hold out long enough
it'll go in the new school. We deserve a straight forward, honest
answer to that question. I'm starting to think I should have
looked up the definition of smart when I first heard this word
associated with our new Superintendent. I assumed mentally alert,
bright, but I'm starting to think they were referring to the
smart that is to cause or be the cause of or seat of a sharp
poignant pain. I hope through your action and words that I am
proved very very wrong. Thank you.
6. Testimony of Mike McColley:
I've lived here for 45 years.
I'm against this K-1, K-2 plan. I don't want the kids split up.
The older kids watch the younger kids when they go to school.
I've seen the score sheet from Sitka since Middag has implemented
the program in Sitka and the scores look lower than Ketchikan
scores and I'm sure all of you guys have seen this.
There's other reasons because you haven't had public testimony.
The community doesn't want their 5th grade son not being able
to walk their first grade daughter to school and back and forth
to watch them. A lot of us, parents and fathers at home, we both
work. Both parents work and it's hard for us also with this.
So I would like to see all of you guys be open minded and listen
to the community, listen to the public, listen to the people.
We're trying to tell you something. Wake up. I don't think you
guys are doing a very good job and I'm serious about that because
you guys are going forward with something that nobody wants and
you haven't done any survey. And I'm sure that a survey, if you
guys were to do one would come back and let you know that this
is true. Thank you.
Comparison of 2000-01 Benchmark and
HSQE Scores of KGBSD & Sitka referred to in this testmony.
7. Testimony of Denise Axtell:
I live at ----- and I wasn't
going to speak tonight but my girlfriend asked me to come and
just be here so that she could speak. And I came across something
yesterday, it's just real short but this I feel is for our whole
community because I know there's....my heart's really aching
for our whole community, for you guys, for everybody. So I just
want to read this. "Hearing confrontation from another is
no problem when one is certain that the other respects, values,
cares in spite of all differences. Caring comes first, confrontation
follows." I just hope that all of us would just take....if
anybody wants this I would love to share it but I think it says
what we need in this community. Thank you.
8. Testimony of Don Mitchell:
Hello. I live at ------. I have
no children in the school system and I'm not an employee of the
school system. I bear the burden of having an interest
in and a concern for the welfare of children. I also pay property
taxes. I have many thoughts about restructuring, I have only
one point I wish to make tonight. I will start with a brief story.
A friend of mine bought a Cadillac over the internet. When it
was delivered, he noticed that it was a VW. When my friend called
and asked about the differences in cars, the dealer stated he
wanted a car and I sent you a car. Obviously, that's not a satisfactory
answer. The dealer must either provide what was ordered or convince
my friend to formally accept the VW. I did a little research
on the construction and remodel of Ketchikan schools. White Cliff
was built in 1927. There's been numerous remodels. For example,
there was an addition built at White Cliff Elementary School
in 1952. Houghtaling was built in 1959 and there were many remodels
of Houghtaling School. Valley Park Elementary school was built
in 1972 and there were a few remodels of that school. Of course,
in 1986 Pt.Higgins was opened. In 1997 the citizens of Ketchikan
voted a bond for the replacement of White Cliff Elementary School.
There were two propositions on that bond. The first was proposition
one, "Shall the Ketchikan Gateway Borough issue a general
obligations bond in the amount not to exceed $10,247,332 dollars
for the maximum term of 20 years for the purpose of funding the
design, rehabilitation and equipping Schoenbar Junior High, Houghtaling
Elementary School, Valley Park Elementary issuance of the bond
to be conditioned upon the receipt of the issuance of seventy
percent of that amount to be refunded by the State." Proposition
two, "Shall Ketchikan Gateway Borough issue a general obligation
bond in the amount not to exceed $9,615,482 dollars for the maximum
of twenty years for the purposes of funding the design and construction
for the replacement of White Cliff Elementary School the issuance
of such bond will be conditioned upon the receipt of the issuance
of seventy percent of that amount shall be refunded by the State."
Each of these remodels and replacements, there have been many
remodels and replacements over the years and they have all been
financed by local property taxes, or a portion of them have been
financed by local property taxes. To pay for these remodels and
constructions, the citizens passed a bond. In each of these cases
the voters were told that the money from the bonds would be spent
on replacing or remodeling elementary schools. An elementary
school according to Random House Dictionary is a school teaching
elementary subjects and extending from grades 6 to 8 years. The
[inaudible] Dictionary on the internet says that an elementary
school is a school including the first 4 or the first 8 years
and often kindergarten. The citizens of Ketchikan for more than
50 years have accepted that definition. They have voted for elementary
schools and they have received elementary schools K-6. An elementary
school is not a K-2 school or grade 3-6 school. These are not
elementary schools. It is not what the citizens agreed to be
taxed for. My friend got a car and the citizens of Ketchikan
got schools. My friend was delivered a significantly different
car than he ordered. The citizens of Ketchikan are being delivered
different schools than they agree to. The board must formally
ask for the consent of citizens of Ketchikan to significantly
alter the use of elementary school buildings. If they do not
obtain the consent of the citizens they will lose their credibility
and support of the community. If the school board continues with
the restructuring ideas it seems that they will invite litigation
against the borough assembly and the school board challenging
the misleading descriptions of both Proposition 1 and Proposition
2 of the October 7th, 1997 ballot and spending public funds contrary
to the Propositions stated intent. They may also invite petitions
which would ask the citizens to clarify their intent on Proposition
1 and 2. I voted on the Propositions, I voted in favor of these
bonds and I did not vote for this restructuring. I voted for
elementary schools. This community is already immersed in a divisive
petition with the Head Tax. I would hope that the school board
would reconsider its restructuring plan in order to avoid another
petition initiative. Thank you for this opportunity.
Comment
On Restructuring
Page 1 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8
Sitnews E-Mail Sitnews
|