Opinion - Editorial
Court's Decision On Pledge
Must Not Stand
By Richard J. Santos
June 29, 2002
Saturday - 1:00 am
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
has ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional.
We should have seen this coming. The U.S. Supreme Court has already
ruled that desecrating the Flag of the United States is "protected
speech."
If the 9th Circuit's ruling is allowed to stand, millions of
American schoolchildren will be denied the right to recite the
Pledge. The denial will exist simply because the phrase "one
nation under God" offends one atheist and two judges. According
to the warped reasoning used by the judges, the words amount
to a government establishment of religion. Thus the Pledge is
"unconstitutional." I can't help but wonder if these
same judges pay their bills via unconstitutional means. After
all, is not U.S. currency emblazoned with the words "In
God We Trust"?
If the word "God" makes the Pledge unconstitutional,
is the oath taken by witnesses in the courtrooms unconstitutional?
What about the oaths of office taken by our public officials,
including judges?
The 9th Circuit's decision clearly contradicts the very words
uttered during the opening of each Supreme Court session: "God
save the United States and this honorable Court." In addition,
the Senate and the House employ chaplains and recite prayers
daily. It is obvious that the members of these bodies have read
the entire First Amendment, including the portion that states
Congress shall pass no law "prohibiting the free exercise"
of religion. The Courts ruled long ago that reciting the Pledge
cannot be mandatory. Thus, only the rights of those belonging
to the overwhelming majority of Americans are being denied.
As national commander of The American Legion, I promise that
our organization will stand with the American people all the
way to the Supreme Court if necessary to correct this grave injustice.
It is sad that while American troops are fighting a war against
terrorism, our courts are fighting a war against the U.S. Flag.
First the Supreme Court rules that flag desecration is protected
speech. Now, the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional.
Opponents of the flag protection amendment have warned of a "slippery
slope." They were right, but the slope is not slanting in
the direction they predicted. The Senate's failure to protect
Old Glory and the actions of the 9th Circuit demonstrate that
when you trivialize the flag of the United States, you trivialize
everything associated with it.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., has called the 9th
Circuit's ruling "just nuts." I share his view. I call
upon him to extend his outrage to the earlier Supreme Court ruling,
permitting flag desecration. Let us not fight this battle halfway.
Respect for the flag and respect for the Pledge of Allegiance
go hand-in-hand. If Sen. Daschle is serious about protecting
the Pledge and the Flag, I ask him to schedule a vote and round
up support for the flag-protection amendment immediately.
If you think that these court actions do not affect you, you
are seriously mistaken.
In his dissent, 9th Circuit Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez warns
that even patriotic songs are endangered. "'God Bless America'
and 'America the Beautiful' will be gone for sure," Fernandez
said. "And while use of the first and second stanzas of
the 'Star-Spangled Banner' will still be permissible, we will
be precluded from straying into the third."
Perhaps this outrage would have never occurred if the judges
had only read the Declaration of Independence. With its references
to "God," the "Creator" and "divine
Providence," it is clear that our founding fathers did not
intend for America to be an atheistic nation. Moreover, flag-protection
laws existed for 200 years before the Supreme Court ruled them
unconstitutional. It is time to return to the American people
the right to protect both: the Pledge of Allegiance and the Flag
of the United States.
Note: Richard J. Santos is
national commander of the 2.8 million-member American Legion,
the nation's largest wartime veterans organization.
Post a Comment -------View Comments
Submit an Opinion - Letter
Sitnews
Stories In The News
|